May 30, 2003
EDITORIAL
A Hummer-Sized Loophole
LA Times Headlines
www.latimes.com
In campaigning for massive tax cuts, President Bush ridiculed
questions about their fairness as "Washington political
rhetoric."
So why does the tax bill he signed into law Wednesday omit a $400
child credit for millions of low-income families but contain a
juicy but obscure boon for the wealthy?
In a last-minute political maneuver, House and Senate leaders
precluded families with incomes of $10,500 to $26,625 from
eligibility for the $400 increase in the child credit to $1,000.
Canceling the provision on the grounds that such families
pay little federal tax anyway saved the government $3.5
billion.
But if savings rather than punishing poor Americans had been the
aim, lawmakers wouldn't have handed out a tax break for huge
sport utility vehicles, even Hummers. Not just a little tax
deduction but as much as $100,000.
It kicks in for individuals with small businesses, potentially
anyone merely filing as self-employed. Depending on the tax
bracket, and especially for those affluent enough to afford
street behemoths with big price tags, this generous depreciation
deduction could be enough to cover the cost of another vehicle,
say a middle-class stalwart sedan like the Honda Accord or Ford
Taurus.
The Natural Resources Defense Council is lobbying to get rid of
the tax loophole with legislation sponsored by Sen. Barbara Boxer
(D-Calif.). Congress should pass this measure and Bush should
sign it into law as soon as possible.
The loophole started innocently enough in 1984 when Congress let
small businesses deduct up to $25,000 of the cost of a working
commercial vehicle, like a dump truck or delivery van. The
deduction covered vehicles weighing 6,000 pounds or more. This
presumably ruled out the family car.
But in recent years, sport utility vehicles grew bigger and
heavier and ever more popular as family cars. The NRDC says 38
models of these family vehicles are heavy enough to qualify for
the deduction.
This year, Bush proposed raising the deduction to $75,000.
Congress boosted it to $100,000. Alas, the lawmakers, perhaps
with a wink, chose not to close the SUV loophole. It's easy to
fix this situation and keep the deduction as a legitimate boost
to small business and job creation. The Boxer plan simply
redefines working commercial vehicles and excludes SUVs.
No one knows how many Americans are prompted to buy an SUV as a
family vehicle because of this deduction. But Congress' Joint
Committee on Taxation estimates that the Boxer exclusion would
save the government $1.3 billion over the next decade.
It's bad enough that giant SUVs guzzle gas and pollute the air.
Congress should halt the ridiculous practice of the government
paying people to buy them. No less reprehensible is lawmakers'
stinginess toward poor families. Of the many questionable
elements in the Bush tax cut, these two are enough to drive you
off a cliff.